Log In
Friday 21st October 2016

Drinks studies skewed

10th January 2007

06052006_ColaBlueSky1.jpgScientific studies into the health effects of foods and beverages may be skewed if funding from the study comes from a food industry player, according to a recent paper in the journal PLoS Medicine.

Researchers led by David Ludwig, director of a child optimal weight programme at the Children's Hospital in Boston, studied 111 separate studies for signs of bias in favour of products made by major financial contributors.

The team concentrated on research about milk, soft drinks and juice, which are often controversial, highly profitable, and aggressively marketed to children.

Using the Medline database at the National Library of Medicine, Ludwig and his colleagues weeded out papers published between 1999 and 2003 which didn't look at health outcomes in humans, or in which funding sources weren't specified.

Other team members then analysed the papers once they had been stripped of identifying information.

The team found that studies funded by industry were four to eight times more likely to show bias in favour of sponsors' products than studies that did not receive industry funding, suggesting that financial conflict could provide fundamental bias in scientific literature.


Share this page


There are no comments for this article, be the first to comment!

Post your comment

Only registered users can comment. Fill in your e-mail address for quick registration.

Your email address:

Your comment will be checked by a Healthcare Today moderator before it is published on the site.

Article Information

Title: Drinks studies skewed
Author: Sue Knights
Article Id: 1654
Date Added: 10th Jan 2007


Report Warns Of Biases in Drink Studies

Recent Related Articles

Childhood obesity plan meets criticism

Meat as bad as sugar at contributing to obesity


Add to scrapbook
Show Comments
Add comment
Find all related articles


Mayden - Innovative cloud-based web development for the healthcare sector
© Mayden Foundation 2016